<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honesty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/</link>
	<description>- to affect public sector decisions in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 19:07:37 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=15#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Marilyn, here&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ripoffreport.com/banks/barclays-bank/barclays-bank-tony-ashplant-an-wyb77.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to get you started.

Some other things you might try...
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aboutidentitytheft.co.uk/q-a-reporting-identity-theft.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Q &amp; A: Reporting Identity Theft&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aboutidentitytheft.co.uk/prosecuting-identity-fraud.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Prosecuting Identity Fraud&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cifas.org.uk/default.asp?edit_id=561-56&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Identity Fraud and Identity Theft&lt;/a&gt; from CIFAS - the UK’s Fraud Prevention Service
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.tech-and-law.com/2009/10/identity-fraud-up-national-identity.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tech and Law&lt;/a&gt; Blog
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legalday.com/currentissues/Identity-Theft.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;legalday.com&lt;/a&gt;
or try a  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.es/search?q=uk+law+identity+fraud&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilyn, here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/banks/barclays-bank/barclays-bank-tony-ashplant-an-wyb77.htm" rel="nofollow">link</a> to get you started.</p>
<p>Some other things you might try&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.aboutidentitytheft.co.uk/q-a-reporting-identity-theft.html" rel="nofollow">Q &#038; A: Reporting Identity Theft</a><br />
<a href="http://www.aboutidentitytheft.co.uk/prosecuting-identity-fraud.html" rel="nofollow">Prosecuting Identity Fraud</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cifas.org.uk/default.asp?edit_id=561-56" rel="nofollow">Identity Fraud and Identity Theft</a> from CIFAS &#8211; the UK’s Fraud Prevention Service<br />
<a href="http://blog.tech-and-law.com/2009/10/identity-fraud-up-national-identity.html" rel="nofollow">Tech and Law</a> Blog<br />
<a href="http://www.legalday.com/currentissues/Identity-Theft.html" rel="nofollow">legalday.com</a><br />
or try a  <a href="http://www.google.es/search?q=uk+law+identity+fraud" rel="nofollow">search</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marilyn</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=15#comment-753</guid>
		<description>Honesty.  

Barclays bank are a dishonest and corrupt bank.  They committed several counts of identity fraud in my name and the british courts let them get scott clean away with fraud because they are are a bank.   If anyone knows anything about their bank manager TONY ASHPLANT please get in touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honesty.  </p>
<p>Barclays bank are a dishonest and corrupt bank.  They committed several counts of identity fraud in my name and the british courts let them get scott clean away with fraud because they are are a bank.   If anyone knows anything about their bank manager TONY ASHPLANT please get in touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bray</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=15#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Nick, I think there is a correlation between what motivates someone and their tendency towards honesty so I don&#039;t think it&#039;s completely off topic.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve seen adverts (and matching CVs) for highly-motivated,  self-starters,  good team players etc, etc.  I can see that such attributes would be valuable in certain roles. But it will take months or years (if ever) to find out whether or not they are bluffing.  I suspect (and have done for years) that most of our leaders and high-flyers (whether in business or politics) are bluffing. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I was just pointing out that the forces have the luxury of being able to shorten this discovery process to a matter of days or weeks. Though I don&#039;t have any good suggestions for how it could be done fr other organisations.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t see how you can conflate a selection process (that you can walk away from at any time) with brainwashing but that&#039;s a subject for another topic :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, I think there is a correlation between what motivates someone and their tendency towards honesty so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s completely off topic.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve seen adverts (and matching CVs) for highly-motivated,  self-starters,  good team players etc, etc.  I can see that such attributes would be valuable in certain roles. But it will take months or years (if ever) to find out whether or not they are bluffing.  I suspect (and have done for years) that most of our leaders and high-flyers (whether in business or politics) are bluffing. </p>
<p>I was just pointing out that the forces have the luxury of being able to shorten this discovery process to a matter of days or weeks. Though I don&#8217;t have any good suggestions for how it could be done fr other organisations.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how you can conflate a selection process (that you can walk away from at any time) with brainwashing but that&#8217;s a subject for another topic <img src='http://lobbygroup.org/<br />
/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldNick666</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>OldNick666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=15#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Yes John. Most sales reps are just brash young man with a personality problem.  They use bullshit in an attempt to cover their ignorance.  Others are highly educated, and well trained.  These command respect and are usually very effective.  I expect these are expensive.  As usual pay peanuts etc.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The army have centuries of experience.  As I understand it they choose the vulnerable, take them apart, put them together again as they want them.  They then parent them for the first time in their lives.  Unfortunately we do not have the luxury of being able/allowed to brainwash employees.  This makes motivation much more difficult particularly when they know they can walk out and live on the state.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Are we getting off topic or is this question of motivation of vital importance in putting together whatever rises from the ashes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes John. Most sales reps are just brash young man with a personality problem.  They use bullshit in an attempt to cover their ignorance.  Others are highly educated, and well trained.  These command respect and are usually very effective.  I expect these are expensive.  As usual pay peanuts etc.</p>
<p>The army have centuries of experience.  As I understand it they choose the vulnerable, take them apart, put them together again as they want them.  They then parent them for the first time in their lives.  Unfortunately we do not have the luxury of being able/allowed to brainwash employees.  This makes motivation much more difficult particularly when they know they can walk out and live on the state.</p>
<p>Are we getting off topic or is this question of motivation of vital importance in putting together whatever rises from the ashes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bray</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=15#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Nick,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Like yourself I was also once a manager of people.  The guy who owned the company once asked me, &quot;John,  you were in the Army,  how do they manage to motivate people so well?&quot;  To which I replied. &quot;It&#039;s quite simple they cheat.  People sign up and the Army finds out is they are self-motivated.  It finds out if they will put their own interests ahead of the team in times of difficulty. Otherwise it sends them back to be civilians.&quot;  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;But how can the Army tell if they are bluffing?&quot;,  he asked.  Easy peasy: don&#039;t let them sleep for at least 48 hours, get them wet and cold, don&#039;t feed them and f**! them about solidly doing stupid things.  Very few people can keep a bluff going under these circumstances.  And after another 24 hours of it your soul is laid bare for all to see.  You are who you are and cannot fool anyone.  And of course these periods of &quot;stress-testing&quot; are only part of on ongoing process.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In my experience the average sales rep was a total dickhead.   These morons simply bulshitted their way through an interview,  got a job,  took the piss,  realised they could never make any bonus because they were useless and then moved on to some other poor company.  I thought of them as turds - ie: just passing through.  In the end I gave up on them and went to talk to customers myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>Like yourself I was also once a manager of people.  The guy who owned the company once asked me, &#8220;John,  you were in the Army,  how do they manage to motivate people so well?&#8221;  To which I replied. &#8220;It&#8217;s quite simple they cheat.  People sign up and the Army finds out is they are self-motivated.  It finds out if they will put their own interests ahead of the team in times of difficulty. Otherwise it sends them back to be civilians.&#8221;  </p>
<p>&#8220;But how can the Army tell if they are bluffing?&#8221;,  he asked.  Easy peasy: don&#8217;t let them sleep for at least 48 hours, get them wet and cold, don&#8217;t feed them and f**! them about solidly doing stupid things.  Very few people can keep a bluff going under these circumstances.  And after another 24 hours of it your soul is laid bare for all to see.  You are who you are and cannot fool anyone.  And of course these periods of &#8220;stress-testing&#8221; are only part of on ongoing process.</p>
<p>In my experience the average sales rep was a total dickhead.   These morons simply bulshitted their way through an interview,  got a job,  took the piss,  realised they could never make any bonus because they were useless and then moved on to some other poor company.  I thought of them as turds &#8211; ie: just passing through.  In the end I gave up on them and went to talk to customers myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldNick666</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>OldNick666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=15#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Albion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think we are getting nearer to agreement on bonuses.  Your acknowledgement that money is pretty low down the motivator list is not all of the story.  Usually bonuses do not just represent money.  They are presented as a large part of status which is much higher up the list.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I believe that this coupling is expensive to the company.  If bonuses were kept confidential between the company and the recipient on pain of repayment on disclosure then they would be much less of a motivator.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I first encountered targets when a young manager looking at the effects of the now discredited Management by Objectives scheme.  The creativity used to fiddle the figures was wonderful to behold.  I would really look up to a manager who could set watertight targets.  Unfortunately in this real world we are stuck with managers who are not exceptionally clever.  Maybe this is part of the argument against bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albion</p>
<p>I think we are getting nearer to agreement on bonuses.  Your acknowledgement that money is pretty low down the motivator list is not all of the story.  Usually bonuses do not just represent money.  They are presented as a large part of status which is much higher up the list.  </p>
<p>I believe that this coupling is expensive to the company.  If bonuses were kept confidential between the company and the recipient on pain of repayment on disclosure then they would be much less of a motivator.</p>
<p>I first encountered targets when a young manager looking at the effects of the now discredited Management by Objectives scheme.  The creativity used to fiddle the figures was wonderful to behold.  I would really look up to a manager who could set watertight targets.  Unfortunately in this real world we are stuck with managers who are not exceptionally clever.  Maybe this is part of the argument against bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asymetric</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>asymetric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=15#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Spin doctor &amp; Albion&lt;br/&gt;Your responses re rating agencies agrees with the point I was making (or trying to make). Existing ratings agencies are arms of businesses with other relationships with the &#039;clients&#039; who they are rating thus they are not going to refuse a good rating. Same principle applies to auditors.&lt;br/&gt;Separation must occur and the fee charged then becomes independent of the firm seeking a rating - i.e. it is not part of the on-going financial arrangements between those companies.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes, it would also be a good idea for other assets as well as bonds but a singluar agency cannot be expected to cover all forms so I was considering the current significant situation. We also know house prices (particularly new builds) have also been manipulated via the entries in the Land Registry.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regarding risk, we come back to a comment I made on another subject - asset value. With asset values based on supply/demand while the banks supply long term loans financed by short term borrowing - particularly in the mortgage market where house prices have risen ridiculously. Such a financing model &#039;backed&#039; by a bubbling valuation of the assets did not go unnoticed but was dismissed because it didn&#039;t fit the model - hence they had created a linear model from a non-linear system. &lt;br/&gt;This is not the first time such a situation has happened and, though it may not be possible to quantify the risk exactly reference to previous situations would have provided a very good approximation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spin doctor &amp; Albion<br />Your responses re rating agencies agrees with the point I was making (or trying to make). Existing ratings agencies are arms of businesses with other relationships with the &#39;clients&#39; who they are rating thus they are not going to refuse a good rating. Same principle applies to auditors.<br />Separation must occur and the fee charged then becomes independent of the firm seeking a rating &#8211; i.e. it is not part of the on-going financial arrangements between those companies.</p>
<p>Yes, it would also be a good idea for other assets as well as bonds but a singluar agency cannot be expected to cover all forms so I was considering the current significant situation. We also know house prices (particularly new builds) have also been manipulated via the entries in the Land Registry.</p>
<p>Regarding risk, we come back to a comment I made on another subject &#8211; asset value. With asset values based on supply/demand while the banks supply long term loans financed by short term borrowing &#8211; particularly in the mortgage market where house prices have risen ridiculously. Such a financing model &#39;backed&#39; by a bubbling valuation of the assets did not go unnoticed but was dismissed because it didn&#39;t fit the model &#8211; hence they had created a linear model from a non-linear system. <br />This is not the first time such a situation has happened and, though it may not be possible to quantify the risk exactly reference to previous situations would have provided a very good approximation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albion</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Albion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=15#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Old Nick,&lt;br/&gt;Like I say, I think we&#039;re going to have to agree to disagree on the bonus issue.  I understand where you&#039;re coming from with the over zealous salesman promising what cannot be deilvered - I&#039;ve seen it myself.  I firmly believe the problem is not with the bonus system itself, but the way it is applied.  Managers are not creative enough with their targets, nor do they consider all the potential outcomes.  For the example you quote above, you tie the bonus to not only the headline figure, but the cost of fulfilling the sale.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes, I have read a little Maslow - incidentally with regard to the motivation of salesmen.  If I remember that correctly, the biggest motivator was respect from their superior and an ability to make their own decisions (to a certain level) without having to make reference to anyone.  Money was some way down the list.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m not saying bonuses are the single most important tool - they do have their place.  However, if used, they have to be well thought out, which comes down to the management that sets the targets.  Ineffective management is a whole different topic!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Incompetence at any level should be dealt by with training, and demotion/dismissal if the training doesn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old Nick,<br />Like I say, I think we&#8217;re going to have to agree to disagree on the bonus issue.  I understand where you&#8217;re coming from with the over zealous salesman promising what cannot be deilvered &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen it myself.  I firmly believe the problem is not with the bonus system itself, but the way it is applied.  Managers are not creative enough with their targets, nor do they consider all the potential outcomes.  For the example you quote above, you tie the bonus to not only the headline figure, but the cost of fulfilling the sale.</p>
<p>Yes, I have read a little Maslow &#8211; incidentally with regard to the motivation of salesmen.  If I remember that correctly, the biggest motivator was respect from their superior and an ability to make their own decisions (to a certain level) without having to make reference to anyone.  Money was some way down the list.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying bonuses are the single most important tool &#8211; they do have their place.  However, if used, they have to be well thought out, which comes down to the management that sets the targets.  Ineffective management is a whole different topic!</p>
<p>Incompetence at any level should be dealt by with training, and demotion/dismissal if the training doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldNick666</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>OldNick666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=15#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Albion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am convinced that the last people who should be paid bonuses are salesmen.  Their push for sales at all costs can do untold damage to a company.  They make promises to customers that can be cripplingly expensive to fulfil. They do not have the companies interest at heart only their own bonus.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Have you read Hertzberg and Maslow? Google will provide some quick summaries.  I would be glad to hear your reasons to disagree with these theories on motivation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;How can you set a realistic target for car sales?  Sales will depend on the quality of the offering and the mood of customers.  Incompetent selling should be dealt with by training or dismissal.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As it happens I have just bought a replacement car and have encountered quite a few incompetent salesmen/women.  I have been taught to sell so I am able to make a fairly realistic assessment.  Their bonuses would have been better spent on proper training.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I agree that FRB cannot be eliminated at a stroke but as a long term objective it may give a better world.  Many good ideas fail because of the difficulty of the transition.  Maybe they can only arise from complete failure and  don&#039;t think we have reached that yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albion</p>
<p>I am convinced that the last people who should be paid bonuses are salesmen.  Their push for sales at all costs can do untold damage to a company.  They make promises to customers that can be cripplingly expensive to fulfil. They do not have the companies interest at heart only their own bonus.</p>
<p>Have you read Hertzberg and Maslow? Google will provide some quick summaries.  I would be glad to hear your reasons to disagree with these theories on motivation.</p>
<p>How can you set a realistic target for car sales?  Sales will depend on the quality of the offering and the mood of customers.  Incompetent selling should be dealt with by training or dismissal.  </p>
<p>As it happens I have just bought a replacement car and have encountered quite a few incompetent salesmen/women.  I have been taught to sell so I am able to make a fairly realistic assessment.  Their bonuses would have been better spent on proper training.</p>
<p>I agree that FRB cannot be eliminated at a stroke but as a long term objective it may give a better world.  Many good ideas fail because of the difficulty of the transition.  Maybe they can only arise from complete failure and  don&#8217;t think we have reached that yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albion</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/07/honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Albion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=15#comment-109</guid>
		<description>OldNick - I think we&#039;re going to have to agree to disagree on bonuses.  I believe they have their place, but need to be assigned to well defined targets and outcomes for the long term good of the business.  Take a used car salesman, for example.  Should he not be rewarded for selling 15 more cars in a month than his target?  As long as the rules in which he can operate are laid down clearly, and the bonus is paid out of realised profits, I can&#039;t see the problem.  What is wrong is excessive bonuses that are expected no matter what, that are based on spurious profit figures based on notional asset values.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regulators can work, they just need to be given the tools to do the job (the laws that you mention), and be independent enough to avoid cosy relationships.  The police alone couldn&#039;t do that - is your average officer clued up enough on to spot a transgression of the law and prosecute accordingly?  I&#039;d be surprised - you need someone who understands the subject to be regulated, be that banking or any other industry to spot these things before they become over complicated.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;FRB cannot be eliminated - certainly in the short term.  What we see today is a shortage of liquidity caused by the disappearance of &#039;money&#039;.  Eliminating FRB is only going to exacerbate that, unless it is done over a long period of time, and co-ordinated with other methods of increasing the money supply.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The FRB system served us well for many years, until the ratios got so badly skewed.  Wind them back a bit, and it becomes less of a problem.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;asymetric - That is idea of significant importance, it just needs to be applied to all credit markets, not just the bond markets.  I&#039;m with Spin Doctor, in addition they need to be truly independent, if a regulator can be such.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Spin Doctor - You&#039;re right, a lot of of the myths surrounding FRB are a lot of conspiracy theories.  I used to think that maybe things like the New World Order and the like were possible.  Since all this has been going on Governments around the world have shown incompetence on so many levels, I now believe it&#039;s simply not possible - they&#039;d never be able to organise it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OldNick &#8211; I think we&#8217;re going to have to agree to disagree on bonuses.  I believe they have their place, but need to be assigned to well defined targets and outcomes for the long term good of the business.  Take a used car salesman, for example.  Should he not be rewarded for selling 15 more cars in a month than his target?  As long as the rules in which he can operate are laid down clearly, and the bonus is paid out of realised profits, I can&#8217;t see the problem.  What is wrong is excessive bonuses that are expected no matter what, that are based on spurious profit figures based on notional asset values.</p>
<p>Regulators can work, they just need to be given the tools to do the job (the laws that you mention), and be independent enough to avoid cosy relationships.  The police alone couldn&#8217;t do that &#8211; is your average officer clued up enough on to spot a transgression of the law and prosecute accordingly?  I&#8217;d be surprised &#8211; you need someone who understands the subject to be regulated, be that banking or any other industry to spot these things before they become over complicated.</p>
<p>FRB cannot be eliminated &#8211; certainly in the short term.  What we see today is a shortage of liquidity caused by the disappearance of &#8216;money&#8217;.  Eliminating FRB is only going to exacerbate that, unless it is done over a long period of time, and co-ordinated with other methods of increasing the money supply.</p>
<p>The FRB system served us well for many years, until the ratios got so badly skewed.  Wind them back a bit, and it becomes less of a problem.</p>
<p>asymetric &#8211; That is idea of significant importance, it just needs to be applied to all credit markets, not just the bond markets.  I&#8217;m with Spin Doctor, in addition they need to be truly independent, if a regulator can be such.</p>
<p>Spin Doctor &#8211; You&#8217;re right, a lot of of the myths surrounding FRB are a lot of conspiracy theories.  I used to think that maybe things like the New World Order and the like were possible.  Since all this has been going on Governments around the world have shown incompetence on so many levels, I now believe it&#8217;s simply not possible &#8211; they&#8217;d never be able to organise it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
