| comments . . .
|
19 Jun 2009 goldtop | Re: Number 1.
This act was a US law was it not? Was there a similar thing in the UK that has since been disregarded? I do think that, on the evidence of recent events, there should be a separation of retail and investment banking.
|
20 Jun 2009 Jericoa | I am no more than an amateurs interest in finance but as I undertsand it glass steagal ring fences off money from savings and current accounts from people like you and me and prevents investment banks using it as leverage to play the markets.
That seems like a pretty sensible idea to me, it does limit the damage that can be done by irresponsible investment banking, it keeps the trouble with those who created the trouble.
Not sure why you object to that to be honest. irt seems pretty cut and dried to me and was akey recommendation in the US (which was only rolled back relatively recently) to stop a 1930's type failure happening again.
|
22 Jun 2009 goldtop | Jericoa,
"Not sure why you object to that to be honest"
Er...I don't. Thats why I said-
"there should be a separation of retail and investment banking"
|
28 Jun 2009 Jericoa | sorry goldtop I read '' i do not think that' for some reason when you clearly said 'I do think that'
|
15 Jul 2009 goldtop | On a personal note, I would like to see a re-organisation of tax rules for the self-employed.
I fail to see how small businesses are helped by punitive rates and 'payments on account' i.e paying tax on money you haven't even earned yet.
|
26 Jul 2009 goldtop | The Euro. Time to join?
|