<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Lobby Group &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lobbygroup.org/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org</link>
	<description>- to affect public sector decisions in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 06:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2010/05/03/goodbye-gordon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2010/05/03/goodbye-gordon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 06:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbygroup.org/?p=982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what must surely be the final week of his reign, I am sorry that I am too busy to spare the time to watch him crash and burn in detail. So I&#8217;ll just wish him farewell. Don&#8217;t go away mad, don&#8217;t go away sad &#8211; just go away.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what must surely be the final week of his reign, I am sorry that I am too busy to spare the time to watch him crash and burn in detail.  So I&#8217;ll just wish him farewell.  Don&#8217;t go away mad,  don&#8217;t go away sad &#8211; just go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2010/05/03/goodbye-gordon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More freedom of speech?</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2010/03/22/more-freedom-of-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2010/03/22/more-freedom-of-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbygroup.org/?p=965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about Karl Winn then &#8211; Mr Popular or what! See: http://karl-winn-taunton.blogspot.com/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Karl Winn then &#8211; Mr Popular or what!</p>
<p>See: <a href="http://karl-winn-taunton.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://karl-winn-taunton.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2010/03/22/more-freedom-of-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thought-Police take on the BNP</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2010/03/14/thought-police-take-on-the-bnp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2010/03/14/thought-police-take-on-the-bnp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government/Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbygroup.org/?p=948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a judge ruled that its constitution could discriminate against non-white people on Friday, the British National Party was banned from accepting any new members. &#8221;I hold that the BNP are likely to commit unlawful acts of discrimination in the terms on which they are prepared to admit persons to membership under their constitution&#8221;, said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a judge ruled that its constitution could discriminate against non-white people on Friday,  the British National Party was banned from accepting any new members. &#8221;<em>I hold that the BNP are likely to commit unlawful acts of discrimination in the terms on which they are prepared to admit persons to membership under their constitution&#8221;,</em> said Judge Collins.<span id="more-948"></span></p>
<p>Nick Griffin acted swiftly to amend the BNP constitution, saying: &#8220;<em>Section 4, which deals with the requirements for membership and includes the demand that members support all the principles of the party, is not protected. I have, therefore, with immediate effect changed the section 4 requirements, as I am entitled to do, to comply with the court order.  What this means is that people can apply to join the BNP without having to endorse and support the principles of the party</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Regardless of whether or not you support the BNP&#8217;s aims,  it does seem a little bizarre.  After all,  isn&#8217;t politics about creating new laws or amending existing ones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2010/03/14/thought-police-take-on-the-bnp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oops</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/05/12/oops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/05/12/oops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goldtop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/05/12/oops/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in case the news is being suppressed in the UK: the BBC quote of the day about GB&#8217;s blusher is only the tip of the story. According to continental sources, the bag lost by Brown&#8217;s aide contained the full spin briefing for his defence against the Telegraph, who are trying to get their hands [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case the news is being suppressed in the UK: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/magazinemonitor/2009/05/tuesdays_quote_of_the_day_62.shtml">the BBC quote of the day</a> about GB&#8217;s blusher is only the tip of the story. According to continental sources, the bag lost by Brown&#8217;s aide contained the full spin briefing for his defence against the Telegraph, who are trying to get their hands on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/05/12/oops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the Lobby Group Website.</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/04/25/welcome-to-the-lobby-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/04/25/welcome-to-the-lobby-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LGO was formed to campaign for the restoration of integrity, courage and creativity in the governance of society in the UK. The group is funded by no-one, and as such is not aligned to any political party, interest group, academic institution or think tank. We are normal people who are asking that our voice be heard. Feel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-150" title="parliament" src="http://www.nutterwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/parliament.jpg" alt="parliament" width="470" height="150" /></p>
<p>LGO was formed to campaign for the restoration of integrity, courage and creativity in the governance of society in the UK.</p>
<p>The group is funded by no-one, and as such is not aligned to any political party, interest group, academic institution or think tank. We are normal people who are asking that our voice be heard.</p>
<p>Feel free to browse the pages and bookmark the site. You can find more information about the group here- <a href="/about">ABOUT</a> and here- <a href="/faq">FAQ</a>. Clicking on the Lobby Group banner at the top of any page will bring you back to the home page.</p>
<p>You can contribute by joining in any of the discussions on our forum or by commenting on any of our posts or by starting discussions of your own. <a href="/forum">Click here to register</a>.</p>
<p>The current focus of the group is on producing an unbiased web based manifesto to present to the media before the next general election. It is our hope that our ideas will be adopted by, or will influence, existing or new political parties. We would like to invite you to join us in the further development of these ideas.</p>
<p>Join the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/04/25/welcome-to-the-lobby-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to re-group</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/04/03/time-to-re-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/04/03/time-to-re-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jericoa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/2009/04/03/time-to-re-group/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[G-20 over, predictable result. Viral e-mail ..no evidense of major distribution as yet, which probably means it is not good enough. I think the idea is sound but the execution very good..but not good enough..it needs more work and possibly needs to be less UK specific. I have some holiday over easter but for now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G-20 over, predictable result. Viral e-mail ..no evidense of major distribution as yet, which probably means it is not good enough.</p>
<p>I think the idea is sound but the execution very good..but not good enough..it needs more work and possibly needs to be less UK specific.</p>
<p>I have some holiday over easter but for now I am going to become an investment banker this weekend and put a few pounds each way on &#8221;offshore account&#8221; (33-1) running in the Grand National.</p>
<p>Wish me luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/04/03/time-to-re-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speak up!</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/27/speak-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/27/speak-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnbray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/2009/02/27/speak-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s not much point in coming here if you&#8217;re not going to bother to say anything. This blog originated at the request of people who felt they wanted to discuss things free from the limitations of BBC moderation. I also got the impression (perhaps mistakenly) that these were people who actually wanted to do something [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s not much point in coming here if you&#8217;re not going to bother to say anything.</p>
<p>This blog originated at the request of people who felt they wanted to discuss things free from the limitations of BBC moderation.  I also got the impression (perhaps mistakenly) that these were people who actually wanted to do something rather than just talk about it. At the &#8220;<span style="font-style: italic;">what&#8217;s the problem</span>?&#8221; stage people seemed happy to join in. Also,  the &#8220;<span style="font-style: italic;">wish list</span>&#8220;/&#8221;<span style="font-style: italic;">wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if</span> &#8230;&#8221; ideas were fairly free-flowing.</p>
<p>Where it seems to have broken down is when it came to the practicalities of what to do. I certainly don&#8217;t have the answers &#8211; this wasn&#8217;t even my idea. Seems to me that if no-one can come up with anything practical that anyone else is prepared to go along with then it may well be the end of the line for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/27/speak-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions that need asking</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/24/questions-that-need-asking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/24/questions-that-need-asking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnbray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/2009/02/24/questions-that-need-asking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s occurred to me that something that could produce a different letter every time you clicked might be neat &#8211; a kind of random-rant generator. There&#8217;s actually quite a wealth of questions people could put to their MP complaints opinions already &#8211; just from our own members. If we could put these in a database [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s occurred to me that something that could produce a different letter every time you clicked might be neat &#8211; a kind of <span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">random-rant generator</span>. There&#8217;s actually quite a wealth of
<list)>
<li> questions people could put to their MP</li>
<li> complaints</li>
<li> opinions</li>
</list)>already &#8211;  just from our own members.</p>
<p>If we could put these in a database it wouldn&#8217;t be too difficult to deal them out at random. If we had enough of these we could even give people a choice of tone: sarcastic, desperate, angry, threatening etc. Maybe a choice of subjects too: repossessions, bail-outs, small business issues, decline in manufacturing or whatever. Here&#8217;s a start: <a href="http://www.lobbygroup.org/RRG/">http://www.lobbygroup.org/RRG/</a></p>
<p>Add your comments/complaints/opinions/ to this post and let&#8217;s build up a stock of awkward questions.</p>
<p>To make the programming easier for me,  please phrase them such as they would follow on from:<br />The question I would like to ask is . . . .<br />What annoys me is . . . .<br />I feel that . . . .<br />
<hr /><a href="http://cynicuseconomicus.blogspot.com/2009/02/bank-of-england-and-printing-money.html">The printing money question</a> &#8211; don&#8217;t say you were never warned about it!</p>
<hr />Here&#8217;s an entertaining generic example &#8230;. <a href="http://www.pakin.org/complaint/">Scott Pakin&#8217;s automatic complaint-letter generator</a> for those who don&#8217;t want to wait for our own version.</p>
<p>and here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.pakin.org/complaint?firstname=The+Government&amp;pgraphs=1&amp;gender=c" target="pakin">ready-made one</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/24/questions-that-need-asking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some ideas.</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/04/mission-statement-proposals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/04/mission-statement-proposals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutterwatch.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First posted on the original Lobby Group blog by contributor Bobrocket- Here are a few of my ideas, what do you think. Change corporate governance rules on executive renumeration so the the shareholders have to vote with only majority of votes cast deciding the issue (ie. don&#8217;t include the non-voting shares in favour of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>First posted on the original Lobby Group blog by contributor Bobrocket-</b>
<p>Here are a few of my ideas, what do you think.</p>
<p>Change corporate governance rules on executive renumeration so the the shareholders have to vote with only majority of votes cast deciding the issue (ie. don&#8217;t include the non-voting shares in favour of the board)</p>
<p>Change corporate accountancy rules to dis-allow off balance sheet accounting (I don&#8217;t actually know what off balance sheet means but it sounds dodgy to me <img src='http://lobbygroup.org/<br />
/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Change corporation tax to be exactly the same as income tax including personal allowance, progressive rate increases etc. (no reduction for small businesses, tax paid in current year, no asset depreciation)</p>
<p>Simplify UK income tax system, all income from whatever source is taxable but raise personal allowances.</p>
<p>Published and open standards of legally required qualification/licensing for professionals to allow free trade of skilled practioners (doctors, dentists, lawyers, scientists, academics etc. ).</p>
<p>Put an end to the practice of using unemployment as a tool to control inflation.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like any of these, I&#8217;ve got some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbygroup.org/2009/02/04/mission-statement-proposals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
